MINUTES OF MEETING RHODINE ROAD NORTH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Regular Meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the  Rhodine  Road  North Community Development District was held on Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. via Zoom Teleconference.

Present and constituting a quorum:

Lauren Schwenk Matthew Cassidy Andrew Rhinehart Patrick Marone

Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Also, present were:

Jill Bums Miche11e Rigoni Heather Wertz April Payeur Clayton Smith

District Manager, GMS District Counsel, HGS District Engineer Developer's Office OMS

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Ms. Bums called the meeting to order and noted that four supervisors were in attendance via Zoom teleconference and a quorum was established.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period
Ms. Burns noted that there were no members of the public present attending via Zoom.

TlliRD  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the May 6, 2020
Board of Supervisors Meeting
Ms. Burns asked for any questions, comments, or corrections  on the May  6, 2020 Board of Supervisors meeting minutes. The Board had no changes to the minutes.

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Marone, with all in favor, the Minutes of the May 6, 2020 Board of Supervisors Meeting, were approved.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Lake	Maintenance
Proposals
Remson Aquatics
Applied Aquatic Management
Mr. Smith reviewed the lake maintenance quotes for monthly services from two vendors, Remson Aquatics and Applied Aquatic. He noted there was a significant difference in the quotes and that he double checked to ensure the scope was similar. Remson's quote totaled $765 per month and Applied Aquatic totaled $1,750 per month. Mr. Smith stated he had  never  worked with Remson but they provided a good price. He felt it was hard to pass up that price.
Mr. Rhinehart stated he had received some feedback on Remson. The owner of Remson owns property across the street and has been maintaining district ponds for 20 years. His office is across the street from the Cassidy Offices. Mr. Smith stated his recommendation would be to accept Remson's proposal. Ms. Bums asked for any questions. Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart,  seconded  by  Mr. Marone,  with  all in favor, the  Lake  Maintenance  Proposal  from  Remson  Aquatics and the Authorization for Counsel to Draft the FoTITI of Agreement, was approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Landscape Maintenance
Proposals
Prince & Sons
Mr. Smith stated he gave them similar scope on what they want priced. Prince is a little higher, but he noted that he had worked with Prince ·at a couple of other areas. Mr. Smith stated that they are looking to break into the area, but they are out of town for this area.

Cardinal Landscaping
Mr. Smith stated that Cardinal was another landscaper that he is familiar with  that  is in the area. He noted that they actually have some high end CDDs in the area. Going through the proposals, they proposed on the same items. Both proposals include 42 cuts for all common areas

and amenity areas. Prince has 19 mows for ponds, Cardinal has 20 and they laid out a schedule. Mr. Smith noted with the quick notice he was not able to give them a perfectly defined scope, but he went through with both of them and explained what the Board wants. Mr. Smith noted the pond mowings can be increased as more people move into the area and live more adjacent to the
ponds. Both proposals include shrub maintenance throughout the year. One difference  is  irrigation monitoring is additional on Prince's, whereas it is included in Cardinals.
Mr. Smith stated he would recommend Cardinal because they are a  lower price, they are in the area, and he has experience working with them as wel1. Mr. Smith asked for any questions. Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, with all in favor, the Landscape Maintenance Proposal with Cardinal Landscaping and the Authorization for Counsel to  Draft the  Fonn of Agreement, was approved.

SIXTH  ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Phase 1 and Phase 2
Tract Conveyance
Ms. Burns noted that Michelle Rigoni was still waiting on the title for these tracts that are outlined. Ms. Burns stated that they were looking to approve subject to final review and delegate the authority to the Chairman to finalize.
Ms. Rigoni stated this morning she received a title opinion that, in her review, looked like it only included Ridgewood and not Ridgewood West. Ms. Rigoni stated that while she had Lauren on the phone, she wanted to confirm that they are looking to convey over  the common area tracts in both Ridgewood and Ridgewood West. Ms. Schwenk stated that was correct. Ms. Rigoni stated that after they review them there may be a couple of additional documents that may be needed, like a partial release of mortgage. Aside from that, the documents the Board has in the package including the warranty deed, the quick claim deed from HOA, because the plat also dedicated the common area tracts may be going to the HOA,  and  other typical  forms, like the Bill of Sale, affidavits for deed, and things like that, are going to be approved in substantial form.
Ms. Burns asked if there were any questions for Ms. Rigoni. Hearing none,

On MOTION by Mr. Marone, seconded by Mr. Rhinehart, with all in favor, the Conveyance of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Subject to Final Review, and Delegation of Authority to the Chair to Finalize, was approved.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2019 Audit
Ms. Burns asked the Board to look on page 26 at the report to management, which is a summary of the audit. Ms. Bums noted it was a clean audit and there were no areas of non­ compliance and no findings. Tt has been submitted to the state as the deadline for submittal  is June 30th• It was reviewed by Counsel and Management and they are looking for motion from the Board to accept the Fiscal Year 2019 Audit.

On MOTJON by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, with alt in favor, the Fiscal Year 2019 Audit, was approved.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
Attorney
Ms. Rigoni had nothing further to report.

Staff Reports

Engineer
Ms. Wertz had nothing further to report.

Field Manager's Report
There being none, the next item followed.

District Manager's Report
Approval of Check Registers
Ms. Bums stated the check register was included in the agenda package. The total amount was $4,838.46. The board had no questions on the check register.

On MOTION by Mr. Marone, seconded by Mr. Rhinehart, with all
in favor, the Check Register totaling $4,838.46, was approved.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement
Ms. Burns noted there was no action needed, but she could answer any questions.
Hearing none, the next item followed.

Ratification of Summary of Series 2019 Requisitions #11 l to #119
Ms. Bums stated these had already been approved and need to be ratified by the board.

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, with all in favor, the Series 2019 Requisitions #111 to #119, were ratified.

Ratification of QGS Change Orders #30 through #33 and QGS for Change Order #1l (Offsite Turn Lane)
Ms. Bums stated these had also been approved by the Chairman and need to be ratified.

On MOTION by Mr. Marone, seconded by Mr. Rhinehart, with all in favor, QGS Change Order #30 through #33 and QGS Change Order# 11, were ratified.

Ratification of Series 2019 Funding Requests #1 and #2
Ms. Bums stated these were related costs and funds that were not available out of the bonds, they had also been approved and need to be ratified.

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, with all in favor, Series 2019 Funding Request #1 and #2, were ratified.

Presentation of Number of Voters - 0
Ms. Burns stated that they are required to determine the number of registered  voters within the District as of April 15th of each year, and there are currently no registered voters living within Rhodine Road North COD.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
There being none, the next item followed.

Other Business

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors	Requests	and	Audience
Comments
Ms. Burns asked for supervisor requests or audience comments. The board had  no requests.

On MOTION by Mr. Rhinehart, seconded by Mr. Marone, with aJI
in favor, the meeting was adjourned.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

� Seet!AssistanBt SeNcretarYy	Q